Read across disciplines: passage pair 1

Read across disciplines: passage pair 1: original cases with explanations after your first response.

Paper packet. Every task here also exists on screen, where it is checked automatically; answers written on paper are not assessed by Nydus. When you are back at a device, enter your answers there.

1. What you will learn

Choose a method from the question's conditions before opening feedback. Work without notes first, then explain which restriction or evidence determined your answer. These are original instructional questions, not an adaptive test or a predictor of an official score.

2. Practice

Read the shared passage and answer every question. Each question is graded separately; select-all questions require the exact set.

Biologists studying a coastal plant found that individuals near roads flowered earlier than those in remote sites. One explanation was adaptation to heat from paved surfaces. To test whether the difference persisted outside those environments, researchers grew seeds from both populations in the same greenhouse. The flowering difference largely disappeared. This result favors an immediate environmental response over an inherited difference, but it does not identify pavement heat as the cause. Roadside plants also experience different light, soil chemistry, and water availability. Separating those influences would require further comparisons.

Which statement best expresses the passage's main point?

A common-environment experiment narrows an explanation without identifying the specific environmental cause.
Roadside flowering differences are entirely inherited.
Pavement heat has been conclusively ruled out.
Greenhouses cannot reveal anything about plant traits.
Remote plants always flower earlier than roadside plants.

Which conclusion is best supported by the passage?

The original comparison alone could not separate several roadside environmental influences.
Soil chemistry must be the dominant cause.
The greenhouse increased genetic differences.
All flowering differences disappeared exactly.
Inherited traits never affect flowering.

Select all statements supported by the passage.

Seeds from both populations were grown together.
The flowering difference became much smaller.
Only pavement temperature differed between the original sites.

3. Practice

Read the shared passage and answer every question. Each question is graded separately; select-all questions require the exact set.

A museum once arranged household objects by material: ceramics in one room, metalwork in another. Its new exhibition instead groups objects around activities such as cooking and repairing clothing. Curators argue that this organization makes relationships among objects visible. A visitor can now see a metal needle beside the cloth it might repair. Critics reply that grouping by use can obscure changes in manufacturing technique. Neither arrangement is neutral: each highlights some relationships and suppresses others. Evaluating the new exhibition therefore requires asking which historical questions it enables visitors to pursue, rather than whether it eliminates interpretation.

Which statement best expresses the passage's main point?

Exhibition arrangements should be evaluated by the questions they illuminate because every arrangement involves interpretation.
Grouping by material eliminates curatorial bias.
Grouping by activity is superior for every historical question.
Museums should stop displaying household objects.
Critics oppose showing metal objects with cloth.

Which conclusion is best supported by the passage?

A display organized by manufacturing changes could serve a different purpose from one organized by use.
Visitors cannot infer uses from objects.
The earlier museum had no metalwork.
The new exhibition removes all ceramics.
Historical questions have no role in curatorial decisions.

Select all statements supported by the passage.

The earlier arrangement grouped objects by material.
Critics raise a concern about manufacturing history.
The author regards one arrangement as interpretation-free.

4. What you can do now

Classify each error as interpretation, method, execution or response format. Revisit the relevant worked lesson, then retry after a study gap. A remembered item is review, not fresh assessment evidence.